Introduction
Advanced camera stabilization, bigger battery, yet more premium build - looking at the specsheet, these are perhaps the key improvements that the Oppo Find X5 Pro brings over last year's model. It may not sound like much at a passing glance, but the Find X3 Pro was good enough to be tough to improve on; plus, all too often, the real advancements are more significant than the seemingly minor differences in specs.
Starting with the camera, we're seeing essentially the same setup as last year - two big-sensor units for main and ultrawide and a telephoto make up the usual trio. And while the telephoto may be relatively modest in both sensor size and reach, the other two come fully loaded - the main camera offers a mix of lens- and sensor-shift stabilization. At the same time, the ultrawide has autofocus, and both are built around large high-res sensors. There's also the in-house MariSilicon X image processing chip whose inner workings we may not entirely grasp, but we should be able to appreciate its results.
It's easy to spot the absence of the 3MP microscope unit of the Find X3 Pro. Unique as it may have been, it was admittedly of limited practical usefulness, so we won't be missing it too much.
This year's model is treated to a battery capacity increase - it's now at 5,000mAh, so the Find is no longer looking underequipped for longevity.
It should be better in terms of physical durability, too, thanks to a switch to ceramic for the back - it's twice as hard as glass, Oppo says.
A top-specced display is mandatory at this level, and the Find X5 Pro's 6.7-inch LTPO2 AMOLED looks to be just that - the 10-bit panel has dynamically adjustable high refresh rate, QHD resolution, and HDR support. Naturally, the Find gets the 2022 flagship Snapdragon chipset, plenty of RAM and storage, fast charging, and Android 12 with a layer of ColorOS on top.
Oppo Find X5 Pro specs at a glance:
- Body: 163.7x73.9x8.5mm, 195g; Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame; IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins).
- Display: 6.70" LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak), 1440x3216px resolution, 20:9 aspect ratio, 525ppi.
- Chipset: Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm): Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510); Adreno 730.
- Memory: 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM; UFS 3.1.
- OS/Software: Android 12, ColorOS 12.1.
- Rear camera: Wide (main): 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm, 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift); Ultra wide angle: 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚, 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF; Telephoto: 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm, 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF.
- Front camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm.
- Video capture: Rear camera: 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video; Front camera: 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS.
- Battery: 5000mAh; Fast charging 80W, 50% in 12 min (advertised), Fast wireless charging 50W, 100% in 47 min (advertised), Reverse wireless charging 10W, USB Power Delivery.
- Misc: Fingerprint reader (under display, optical); NFC.
Oppo Find X5 Pro unboxing
The Find X5 Pro shows up in a two-piece cardboard box in a gray livery with a big bold '5' in the top left corner and the full name of the handset in the lower half - the same design as the previous generation.
The retail bundle for our global variant includes an 80W SuperVOOC adapter and a cable to go with it - those are proprietary peripherals and are needed if you want to get the fastest possible charging speeds.
Oppo has also bundled a protective case - a white translucent one with a texture on the inside. The Gorilla Glass Victus-covered display gets a further layer on top as well - a factory applied plastic screen protector. No more earbuds, though - the previous generation still had them, this one doesn't.
Design, build quality, handling
An elaborate piece to manufacture, the Oppo Find X5 Pro's ceramic back allegeldy takes 168 hours to make (a full week, non-stop?) over 45 different processes, of which 269 minutes and 14 processes are just for finishing - if we're interpreting the promo materials correctly. Available in Ceramic White and Glaze Black (ceramic only implied on this one), the Find sure is about as premium s they come.
China also gets a third version with a pale blue faux leather back, but the global variant is limited to the two ceramic options. In a way that makes the 5 just like the 2 - back in 2020, you could have the Find X2 Pro with ceramic or leatherette back panels. The Find X3 Pro, meanwhile, was glass front and back. In case it wasn't clear - there's no '4' generation of Find Xs because of China's cultural aversion to that specific number.
Perhaps this is an appropriate point to mention that the blue leather version is a good 23g lighter at an already sizeable 195g, and the ceramic ones tip the scales at 218g. While that's pretty hefty, key competitors like the iPhone 13 Pro Max (240g) and Galaxy S22 Ultra (228g) are even heavier, so we won't be lamenting the lack of the leather option outside of China.
Having said that, if you're after a lighter Find, the non-Pro X5 is there for you, though you'll have to make some concessions in the build (on top of the internal differences that are a separate topic). Most notably, that would be the lack of an IP rating (the Pro is IP68-rated) and a more slippery, if still appealing in its own right, frosted back surface.
Find X5 (left) next to Find X5 Pro
At just under 200g, the Find X3 Pro, too, is lighter than the X5 Pro, so you'd be forgiven to think that the 25g generational increase in weight is caused by the back panel's material swap only. It's not though - there's a larger battery that can share some of that responsibility (5,000mAh vs. 4,500).
Find X3 Pro (left) next to Find X5 Pro
Enough about weight though, on to look and feel. Ceramic-backed phones tend to have this specific aura of density and stiffness - in a good way - that glass doesn't quite match. The Find X5 Pro is no different, and we'd say it outpremiums your average S-series Galaxy, for example.
With twice the hardness of glass, the Find's back panel should be more durable, particularly in terms of scratch resistance, when compared to glass backs, Gorilla Glass Victus as they may be.
The panel will pick up smudges after coming in contact with the skin of your fingertips, but the white colorway of our review unit makes them all but disappear - you need to have light reflecting off of it and directly into your eyes to spot the fingerprints. We can imagine that the black version will be much more prone to advertising smudges.
The gently sloping camera island of the Find X3 Pro was somewhat polarizing last year, but the design has matured pretty nicely.
Find X3 Pro (left) next to Find X5 Pro
Now even more flowingly shaped, the camera bump blends with the back in hard contrast to the deliberately accented assemblies on other phones. The slanted bottom end of the island helps accentuate that notion of fluidity too.
The black camera lenses can either be taken as an eyesore, in which case the black colorway would be a better option, or as a form-following-function accent. The two big-sensor modules, the main camera and the ultrawide, are on the left. Between them sits a shameless plug for the in-house MariSilicon image processing chip. The telephoto shares a window with a light temperature sensor while the flash and one of the three mics get separate cutouts.
Down the right side of the rear is the Oppo logo, followed by a Hasselblad badge to emphasize the partnership between the smartphone and the camera companies. A bit oddly, but in a most welcome way, there are no further texts on the Find X5 Pro's back - our non-Pro was littered with regulatory stamps and whatnot.
The ceramic slab curves towards all four edges where it meets the polished aluminium frame. The frame is thinner on the sides and slightly meatier on top and bottom and at the corners. It's interrupted by antenna strips in 7 spots, something we observed on the closely related OnePlus 10 Pro, iQOO 9 Pro and Realme GT2 Pro (all of them BBK Electronics-made phones).
The antennas positions all around the frame improve the phone's reception and connectivity capabilities. A combination of software and hardware optimizations improves the 5G cellular connection, Wi-Fi and NFC. The software decides which of the antennas to use depending on how you are holding the phone. Surprisingly, this also works for NFC too so you can touch another NFC device or a tap-to-pay terminal with any area of the upper half of the phone. It works at any angle - even with the frame or the screen facing the other device.Oppo maintains a level of separation between the physical controls - the power button is on the right (with the signature green accent inside it), while the volume buttons, two discrete ones, are on the left.
Power button on the right • Volume buttons on the left
The SIM slot is on the bottom, and it will take one or two nano-sized cards. There's no option for memory expansion on the Find X5 Pro, as expected. Also in this vicinity are the USB-C port, the pinhole for the primary mic, as well as the bottom loudspeaker.
Dual SIM tray on the bottom • A lone mic pinhole up top
The other loudspeaker is on the front, behind a mesh-covered notched section of the Gorilla Glass Victus sheet that protects the display. The speaker also doubles as an earpiece, if you're into that.
Another cutout, this one in the actual display instead of its protective glass, is for the selfie camera - in the top left corner.
The AMOLED display is curved at the sides - not a whole lot but enough, perhaps, to irk flat display die-hards. For what it's worth, this reviewer encountered no issues with misinterpreted touch input at the sides, but that may not necessarily be everyone's experience.
The black bezels around the display are fitting for a top-tier handset, we'd say. The top and bottom strips are slightly thicker than the sides but are the same between them, so the symmetry is there.
Embedded underneath the display is an optical fingerprint sensor. We appreciate its relatively high placement, particularly on a substantial phone like the Find X5 Pro, where finger gymnastics would be that extra bit more dangerous.
In summary, we find the Find X5 Pro's design and build pretty to look at and pleasing to touch, and we suppose the phone will be durable in the long run. Ergonomics are about what you can expect from a full-size high-end phone - it's big and heavy, but not bigger and heavier than its main rivals. Bonus points for the fingerprint sensor placement and separated physical buttons, while the curved display edges remain a personal preference.
Display worthy of the class
The Find X5 Pro's display is a 6.7-inch OLED with high resolution, high refresh rate, high brightness, high color fidelity, high everything - as is the norm in the high-end segment. Using a Samsung-made LTPO2 AMOLED panel, the Find overs variable refresh rate in the 1-120Hz range. The native resolution is 1440x3216 in a 20:9 aspect ratio for a pixel density of 525ppi.
Being a 10-bit panel, it also boasts a capability to display up to 1 billion 'colors' for smoother tonal gradations. HDR10+ is supported where the phone could potentially reach 1300nits of brightness, while in ordinary situations, the max brightness is 800nits as per the press materials.
When measuring the Find X5 Pro's max brightness at 75% APL (the fill area of the white pixels on the screen), we got 475nits when operating the slider manually and 762nits when the Auto brightness was left in charge in a bright environment. These are essentially the same numbers as the ones we measured on last year's model, as well as this year's OnePlus 10 Pro, which has basically the same panel.
Having said that, we've been getting 1000nits on rival models while Galaxies and iPhones can go in excess of 1200nits. How much of a practical advantage that is, is debatable, but the point is that Find X5 Pro isn't among the brightest out there.
| Display test | 100% brightness | ||
| Black, |
White, |
||
| 0 | 475 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 762 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 493 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 774 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 468 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 782 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 1214 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 494 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 829 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 1266 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 506 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 1050 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 852 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 1050 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 497 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 860 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 609 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 754 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 498 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 780 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 482 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 778 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 438 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 1000 | ∞ | |
It may not be the brightest display, but it can be among the most accurate ones. We measured an average dE2000 of 1.2 for the set of sRGB test swatches in Natural mode, which dropped to 0.8 after a gentle nudge of the temperature slider in the warm direction. Natural isn't the default mode, though - Vivid is, and we got less accurate color rendition with the all-too-common blue shift. That too improved with a temperature adjustment, though - pushing the slider all the way to the right got us an average dE2000 of 2.0 for the DCI-P3 swatches.
There's also a Pro mode with two sub-modes. Cinematic targets accurate Display P3 reproduction and manages to deliver spectacularly, while Brilliant is just an all-out super-saturated mode.
When it comes to HDR, we got Netflix and YouTube to serve HDR streams, but not so much Amazon Prime Video. Both Netflix and Prime happily played back in 1080p - naturally, the phone has the Widevine L1 certification needed for that.
Refresh rate is handled by a simple menu with just two options - Standard and High. Standard sets the RR ceiling at 60Hz, while High allows it to go all the way up to the maximum 120Hz. Both modes employ auto switch-down to whatever RR the software logic decides is most appropriate at the moment based on app, content, and activity.
The minimum screen refresh rate is dependent on the screen brightness level. We observed the phone drop to the promised 1Hz when idling but only when set to nearly its maximum brightness level. Just below that, there's another narrow brightness range where the minimum RR is 5Hz, and below that, for the widest brightness range, the minimum RR when idling is 10Hz. At very low brightness levels, we had constant 120Hz readings.
In general, the Find will seize every opportunity to drop to a minimum refresh rate (the brightness mandated one) when you don't touch it for even a brief instant. That's the behavior across the UI, in social apps, in browsers, and even in video apps (like YouTube or Netflix) as long as there's no video actually playing.
Speaking of, videos were treated somewhat weirdly in our experience, with 24fps clips getting a 30Hz refresh rate and the phone reporting a constantly changing 30Hz-60Hz refresh rate for 48fps videos (maybe a peculiarity in reporting, and it was, in fact, a steady 48Hz?). 30fps and 60fps videos do get as many Hz as fps.
Browsers tend to remain at 60Hz when there's moving content being displayed, but they will both drop to the minimum for static pages when idling and also spike to 120Hz when you touch the screen to scroll. Games appear limited to 60Hz, though.
Oppo Find X5 Pro battery life
The Find X5 Pro is equipped with a 5,000mAh battery - a meaningful increase over the 4,500mAh power pack of the Find X3 Pro and slightly more than the Find X5 non-Pro. It's more or less the norm in the high-end segment of the Android world, with only the Xiaomi 10 Pro at 4,600mAh. There's also the iPhone 13 Pro Max' 4,352mAh capacity, but that's an iPhone, and things work differently there.
On the Find X5 Pro, we clocked 17:21h of looping videos offline (the phone kept a 30fps refresh rate for our video, even in the Standard 60Hz mode) - not a class-leading result, but not half-bad either.
In the Wi-Fi web browsing, the Find was good for 14:14h - a similarly middle-of-the-pack number. Mind you, the phone was reporting to be switching between 30Hz and 10Hz most of the time, with occasional spikes to 60Hz for this test - we didn't observe it going up to 120Hz despite carrying out the test in the High refresh rate mode.
With the above taken into account, it's no wonder that the voice call longevity turned out similarly 'average' at 26:36h. Factoring in a standby performance along those lines, the Find X5 Pro posted an overall Endurance rating of 101h - a lot better than last year's model or this year's Xiaomi 12 Pro, but slightly worse than the Galaxy S22 Ultra and the OnePlus 10 Pro.
Our battery tests were automated thanks to SmartViser, using its viSerDevice app. The endurance rating denotes how long the battery charge will last you if you use the device for an hour of telephony, web browsing, and video playback daily. More details can be found here.
Video test carried out in 60Hz refresh rate mode. Web browsing test done at the display's highest refresh rate whenever possible. Refer to the respective reviews for specifics. To adjust the endurance rating formula to match your own usage - check out our all-time battery test results chart.
All of the above tests were carried out with the screen set to 1440p resolution, which isn't the default option. We figured we'd rerun the web browsing test at 1080p - just to check, and we got the exact same result as the 1440p test, so dialling down the resolution doesn't make sense, at least from power consumption point of view.
Charging speed
The Find X5 Pro is bundled with an 80W SuperVOOC power adapter, and Oppo says it should charge the phone to 50% in just 12 minutes. That's not among the metrics we keep track of normally, but we specifically checked and only got 40% for 12minutes of charging. That said, we'd still argue that the Find excels at charging speed, if it's not exactly a record-breaker.
80W SuperVOOC charger
It took 40 minutes for a full charge from flat, and it was at 91% at the half-hour mark. That's ever so slightly quicker to 100%, albeit not quite as full at 30 minutes when compared to the Find X5 we tested - apparently, Oppo has implemented different charging curves on the two phones.
Perhaps more importantly, the Find X5 Pro doesn't charge as fast as last year's Find X3 Pro, which took less than half an hour from zero to 100%. We reckon this development has something to do with Oppo prioritizing battery health in the long run - they claim that the Find X5 Pro's battery should be good for 1600 charge cycles, or twice as many as the industry-standard, according to their press materials.
30min charging test (from 0%)
Higher is better
- Oppo Find X3 Pro
100% - Xiaomi 12 Pro (120W)
100% - iQOO 9 Pro
100% - OnePlus 10 Pro
98% - Oppo Find X5
94% - Oppo Find X5 Pro
91% - Realme GT2 Pro
91% - Huawei P50 Pro
73% - Samsung Galaxy S22+ (25W)
62% - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (25W)
61% - Google Pixel 6 Pro
48% - Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (20W Apple)
42%
Time to full charge (from 0%)
Lower is better
- Xiaomi 12 Pro (120W)
0:21h - iQOO 9 Pro
0:21h - Oppo Find X3 Pro
0:28h - OnePlus 10 Pro
0:32h - Oppo Find X5 Pro
0:40h - Realme GT2 Pro
0:40h - Oppo Find X5
0:42h - Huawei P50 Pro
0:50h - Samsung Galaxy S22+ (25W)
1:02h - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (25W)
1:04h - Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (20W Apple)
1:46h - Google Pixel 6 Pro
1:52h
The Find X5 Pro also supports wireless charging. The WPC listing says the phone is capable of taking up to 15W and it adheres to the Extended Power Profile. That's with standard peripherals, however. Using Oppo's proprietary AirVOOC accessories, the phone is listed to support up to 50W of wireless charging for a claimed time of 47 from 'near-empty to 100%'. We haven't been able to test that, though.
It's good to know that the Find can also charge other devices off its back - at up to 10W.
Speaker test
The Find X5 Pro has a stereo speaker setup with one bottom-firing unit and another one up top that also doubles as an earpiece. The software respects the phone's orientation in landscape and sends the correct channels depending on how you're holding it, while in portrait, the earpiece gets the left channel.
Bottom speaker • Top speaker (between the display glass and the frame)
The Find X5 Pro earned a 'Very Good' rating for loudness in our speaker test, a notch above the non-Pro. It's louder than both the Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Xiaomi 12 Pro, with only the iPhone 13 Pro Max putting out a bit more volume.
The Find sounds pretty great too. It doesn't quite have the iPhone's low-end rumble but offers pleasing vocals, crisp treble and overall great clarity. The two speakers aren't exactly equal in their capabilities, and the bottom one is louder and boomier, but the two work very well in tandem.
Use the Playback controls to listen to the phone sample recordings (best use headphones). We measure the average loudness of the speakers in LUFS. A lower absolute value means a louder sound. A look at the frequency response chart will tell you how far off the ideal "0db" flat line is the reproduction of the bass, treble, and mid frequencies. You can add more phones to compare how they differ. The scores and ratings are not comparable with our older loudspeaker test. Learn more about how we test here.
ColorOS 12.1 on top of Android 12
The Find X5 and X5 Pro are technically the first two handsets we get to experience with Oppo's new ColorOS 12 running on top of Android 12. The Oppo Find N got really close, but it had Android 11 underneath the custom bits. We still know what to expect, and everything looks familiar.
And by familiar, we mean nearly identical not only to the ColorOS 12 build that came with the Find N but also to the recently introduced Realme UI 3.0. We are talking looks, iconography, quick toggles - pretty much everything. Most of the features are also translated into the .1 version of ColorOS. It's maybe part of BBK Electronic's approach to software development and the idea that the more streamlined and unified OS experience will make support and development much easier to handle for multiple devices.
Anyway, if you've used ColorOS before, or Realme UI for that matter, you will feel right at home. The app drawer is optional - the default state is a single-tiered, everything-on-the-homescreen UI, at least on this unit of ours - somewhat odd, given that the non-Pro Find X5 came with the Drawer pre-enabled. The notification shade, meanwhile, is presented in the standard way. So is the recent apps menu, in the sense that you get side-scrollable vertical cards.
The main Settings menu features Oppo's colorful icons for easier navigation. The only difference we noticed compared to the Realme UI is the absence of an Auto brightness toggle in the notification shade. It's kind of annoying to look for the toggle deep in the settings menus instead of having one right next to the brightness slider.
Homescreen • App drawer • Recent apps • Notification shade • Quick toggles • Settings
Android 12's new privacy features are implemented in ColorOS 12, now that it's made the leap to the new core version. You get a summary of all the apps that use your data, location, camera, microphone, etc. all in one place. It's called Privacy Dashboard and is something like Digital Wellbeing but privacy-focused. And in case you don't want certain apps to have your exact location, you might want to give them approximate location instead. Toggles for limiting camera and mic access across the board can be placed in the quick toggles area too.
Privacy menu • Privacy dashboard • App gets precise location • Camera and mic access toggles
For a more in-depth look at Android 12, we suggest reading our full Android 12 review as we will try to focus on the ColorOS itself in the following paragraphs.
Most of the UI elements on ColorOS can be customized. We are talking deep customization of app icons, accent colors, quick toggles and their shape, font, fingerprint reader animation, Edge lighting for incoming notifications, the Always-on display - the lot. A theme store is also available.
UI customizations
We also liked the granular notification customization. The system allows for advanced notification handling in the drop-down menu, such as instant replies or other suggested actions. Incoming notifications when the phone is in use will arrive with quieter sound and milder vibration. Notification snoozing is another neat feature that lets you attend to conversations or other apps later without having to keep them in the notification shade and clutter up.
For enhanced privacy, the system will hide the contents of the notification once the front-facing camera detects someone other than you. This requires the facial unlocking feature to be enabled and uses that data to match to your mug.
Notification options
The Icon pull-down gesture is here to make it way easier to operate with one hand on an overcrowded home screen with plenty of app icons. Just swipe down alongside the edge of the display to bring down the icons close to your thumb and select an app to launch. The gesture is consistent and useful.
We can't miss mentioning the excellent haptic feedback. Oppo uses an X-axis linear motor and calls the whole experience O-Haptics. You can set the vibration intensity as well as the touch feedback style - it can either be Crisp or Gentle. And that's just for the UI interactions and touches. The O-Haptics support customized vibration patterns for different people in your contact list. Particularly useful for people relying solely on vibration instead of ringtones.
Icon-pull down gesture • Icon-pull down gesture • O-Haptics options
The Special features tabs hold the familiar Smart Sidebar and Flexible windows functions. They are both tailored toward better multitasking. The sidebar offers quick access to some of your favorite apps when turned on. The system allows you to adjust the position of the sidebar, which is crucial because it might interfere with the back gesture if you are using the standard Android gestures. Anyway, tap and hold on an app icon that enters split-screen mode while a single tap opens up the app in a floating window or, as Realme likes to call it, "Flexible window". The supported apps can be opened in small, draggable and size-adjustable windows.
The Quick launch function has been around on OnePlus' OxygenOS-powered phones for a while now, and it's nice to see it making its way to other brands under the BBK Electronics umbrella. Once enabled, you can set up three apps that can launch as soon as the display is unlocked. Tap and hold on the fingerprint reader from a locked screen to open up the Quick launch menu.
The good old screen-off gestures that allow you to launch certain apps or the flashlight by drawing letters on a locked screen are here to stay.
Special features
Performance and benchmarks
The Find X5 Pro has the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 inside, one of the key differences when comparing against the non-Pro and its year-old SD888. It's one in a long line of SD8G1 devices that we've already seen, so performance isn't going to be a surprise.
Similarly to the OnePlus 10 Pro with which the Find X5 Pro shares a lot of hardware and software, we saw relatively conservative numbers in GeekBench, particularly in the single-core test, but also under multi-threaded load. Another sister phone, the Realme GT2 Pro recorded significantly higher figures.
GeekBench 5 (single-core)
Higher is better
- Realme GT2 Pro
1238 - iQOO 9 Pro
1231 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
1180 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
1169 - Oppo Find X5
1110 - Huawei P50 Pro
1105 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
1042 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
1002 - OnePlus 10 Pro
975 - Oppo Find X3 Pro
926
GeekBench 5 (multi-core)
Higher is better
- iQOO 9 Pro
3708 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
3682 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
3657 - Realme GT2 Pro
3501 - OnePlus 10 Pro
3447 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
3433 - Oppo Find X5
3331 - Oppo Find X3 Pro
3316 - Huawei P50 Pro
3145 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
2831
The Find X5 Pro came into its own in Antutu, where it snatched the lead among this select group of top-tier handsets.
AnTuTu 9
Higher is better
- Oppo Find X5 Pro
1012896 - iQOO 9 Pro
997948 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
985226 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
968359 - Realme GT2 Pro
966251 - OnePlus 10 Pro
886248 - Oppo Find X5
810715 - Huawei P50 Pro
786215 - Oppo Find X3 Pro
745653 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
719815
In GFXBench, the Find X5 Pro is closely aligned with the rest of 1440p phones powered by the same Snapdragon. The non-Pro has the upper hand in onsreen tests where its 1080p resolution gives it an edge, but it's no match for raw performance, as evidenced by the offscreen results.
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (onscreen)
Higher is better
- Oppo Find X5
40 - OnePlus 10 Pro
37 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
36 - Realme GT2 Pro
36 - iQOO 9 Pro
36 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
35 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
30 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
28 - Huawei P50 Pro
27
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
- OnePlus 10 Pro
43 - Realme GT2 Pro
42 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
41 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
40 - iQOO 9 Pro
40 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
31 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
31 - Oppo Find X5
27 - Huawei P50 Pro
22
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (onscreen)
Higher is better
- OnePlus 10 Pro
41 - Realme GT2 Pro
39 - Oppo Find X5
38 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
37 - iQOO 9 Pro
37 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
36 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
29 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
26 - Huawei P50 Pro
26
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
- OnePlus 10 Pro
48 - Realme GT2 Pro
46 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
45 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
44 - iQOO 9 Pro
44 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
35 - Oppo Find X5
30 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
30 - Huawei P50 Pro
30
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (onscreen)
Higher is better
- Oppo Find X5
55 - OnePlus 10 Pro
48 - Realme GT2 Pro
48 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
46 - iQOO 9 Pro
46 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
44 - Huawei P50 Pro
44 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
39 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
37 - Oppo Find X3 Pro
33
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
- OnePlus 10 Pro
97 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
96 - Realme GT2 Pro
95 - iQOO 9 Pro
95 - Oppo Find X5 Pro
94 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
76 - Oppo Find X3 Pro
70 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
70 - Oppo Find X5
69 - Huawei P50 Pro
64
Similarly tightly packed in 3DMark, the rest of the SD8G1 handsets still fall ever so slightly behind the Find X5 Pro.
3DMark Wild Life Vulkan 1.1 (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
- Oppo Find X5 Pro
9758 - iQOO 9 Pro
9673 - Xiaomi 12 Pro
9664 - OnePlus 10 Pro
9610 - Realme GT2 Pro
9487 - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (1440p)
7437 - Google Pixel 6 Pro
6602 - Oppo Find X5
5851 - Oppo Find X3 Pro
5653 - Huawei P50 Pro
5651
As is the norm with flagships, those high numbers aren't sustainable, and the score quickly drops with subsequent loops of the Wildlife test. The Find settled at a modest 60-ish percent of its maximum performance as quickly as the fourth loop of the test.
In the CPU throttling test, the Find X5 Pro maintained its composure comparatively well. Its performance waned gradually over the first twenty minutes of the benchmark, and it was only then that a more significant drop was observed. Even so, it maintained performance levels around 70% of its initial result, and it was rock solid in its output - no random dips or spikes.
CPU throttling test
50MP main and ultrawide cameras, 13MP tele, microscope gone
The Find X5 Pro has more or less the same camera system as the phone it replaces - in principle, at least. Its main and ultrawide cameras rely on the same 50MP Sony sensor, and the telephoto still offers just 2x zoom.
There are further nuances, however. Starting with what's missing, the 3MP microscope didn't make the cut this year. We already mentioned in our initial impressions that it was finicky enough in use and limited in its practical application that we won't be losing sleep over its absence on the Find X5 Pro.
The primary camera may still be using the same IMX766 sensor (50MP, Quad Bayer, 1/1.56", 1.0µm), but it's now got sensor-shift image stabilization added. It covers 3 axes - two translations and rotation around an axis perpendicular to the sensor plane, and that last one can't be done by lenses.
The lens itself is also stabilized, though - it corrects the two remaining axes of rotation, making for a combined 5-axis stabilization system. It also now uses an actual glass element on the front, which Oppo says helps reduce chromatic aberrations by 77%. Somewhere along the way, it's also gotten slightly wider (25mm equivalent now vs. 26mm before) and slightly brighter (f/1.7 vs. f/1.8).
The ultrawide camera is seemingly unchanged, and still has a 110-degree coverage with its f/2.2 aperture lens. It has autofocus, too, so it can work for closeups.
The IMX766 sensor that's at the heart of both the main and the ultrawide cameras features all-pixel omnidirectional autofocus, so it's sensitive to detail changes in both the horizontal and vertical direction. It can also focus reliably across the entire frame.
The telephoto uses a 13MP sensor, and our Find X5 Pro reports that to be the Samsung S5K3M5. It's a 1/3.4" sensor with 1.0µm pixels and a conventional Bayer color filter. The lens offers 2x zoom, an f/2.4 aperture, and isn't stabilized.
On the front, the Find gets a 32MP selfie camera, which reports being using the Sony IMX709 sensor (32MP, Quad Bayer, 1/2.74", 0.8µm). The lens has a fixed focus and an f/2.4 aperture, but, more importantly, it's wider than most at 21mm equivalent.
Then there's the matter of the under-the-hood things. Oppo is employing an in-house-developed MariSilicon X NPU whose all-powerful image processing pipeline enables 4K Ultra Night Video capture (in theory - it was still missing on our review unit) and a wide dynamic range for general video recording.
The Hasselblad collaboration, meanwhile, brings the Swedish camera company's color science on board, for what Oppo calls Natural Color Calibration. The 13-channel spectral sensor on the back undoubtedly helps in the color department by enabling more precise auto white balance.
The camera app bears Hasselblad-inspired touches, too, most notably the orange shutter release button. It's essentially the same as the one found on the latest Realmes and OnePlus phones.
Swiping on the viewfinder or the scroller below switches between modes, while the additional ones can be found under the "More" sub-menu. There's an option to re-arrange the modes to your liking.
The general Settings menu is found under the three-dot button in the upper-right corner of the viewfinder. That's also where you can switch off the automatic Macro detection.
And although there's a dedicated Night mode, we found that even in Photo mode, there's Night mode processing at play if the lighting conditions are met. It doesn't take more than a second or two at most for the capture and stacking process. There's also a tripod mode within the Night mode that uses longer exposure for better results. The Night mode is supported on all three cameras.
Oppo has brought Pro mode support to all of its cameras, but switching between lenses is a bit tricky. When you have the main camera active, it will give you two toggles on the viewfinder - 1x and 2x zoom. Both of which shoot with the main camera. The same applies to the ultrawide and the telephoto camera. One would wonder why would you want to shoot 2x zoom photos using the ultrawide camera.
In any case, the Pro mode gives you control over the usual stuff like ISO, exposure, white balance, manual focus and shutter speed. There are also focus peaking and histogram to help you out.
Some of those options are available in the so-called Movie mode for video capturing. There's a way to enable the advanced stabilization, HDR, a LOG option for wider dynamic range, ISO, shutter speed and histogram. it works with all three cameras, too.
Camera UI
Daylight image quality
The Find X5 Pro's main camera images are really easy to like. We find the lively colors most appealing, and the wide dynamic range contributes to that overall expressive look. If you're into more conservative processing, the Find is likely not going to be your top choice, but if you like images that pop without any need for tweaking after the fact, it will keep a smile on your face.
Daylight samples, main camera (1x)
Detail is very good too, offering a sensible level of sharpening without overdoing it. The skies do have some grit in them, so these images aren't strictly noise-free, but noise is far from being objectionable.
Daylight samples, main camera (1x)
If, for whatever reason, you find the regular photos lacking in saturation and contrast (which would be troubling, but everyone is entitled to their own taste), the AI toggle will boost both these noticeably. As a result of some poor planning, we only shot these at the nominal 50MP resolution, but the global properties are the same regardless of resolution.
Daylight samples, main camera (1x), 50MP, AI on
That nicely leads us to the 50MP mode, of which there's more than one, so to speak. There's the 50MP toggle that lets you shoot at 50MP on both the main and the ultrawide cameras, as usual.
Shot this way, photos from the main camera don't present an improved level of detail; they're just enlarged 4 times, making the grain, aliasing, and sharpening halos more noticeable.
Daylight samples, main camera (1x), 50MP, AI off
But there's also the High-res mode in the mode selector, which is only available for the main camera. Judging by that limitation and the fact that the Find X5 non-Pro doesn't have the mode at all, plus the difference in the resulting images compared to the ones above, we'd speculate that it employs the sensor-shift mechanism to capture images with a minuscule offset and then blends them into one high-resolution 50MP photo.
Indeed, these High-Res photos have more detail, finer detail, much smoother slanted lines with no aliasing jaggies, and essentially no noise. The sharpening halos are gone too. They're not perfect, of course, and some busy random textures could have a... weird look. But overall, these are among the better shots we've seen at nominal resolution from a Quad Bayer (or the like) sensor, and we suspect it's not just down to different demosaicking.
Daylight samples, main camera (1x), 50MP, High-res mode
The Find X5 Pro's ultrawide camera delivers some of the sharpest and most detailed images we've seen from an ultrawide - grass, twigs, straight lines, everything has a nice crispiness to it. Again, there's some fine graininess in flat-colored areas as well as in the lower midtones, but it's not something that has us remotely bothered.
The color reproduction maintains that punchy look we enjoyed on the main camera, though it may or may not fully match its white balance from scene to scene, depending on what fits the frame. Dynamic range is also great - for an ultrawide but also in absolute terms.
Daylight samples, ultrawide camera (0.6x)
Once again, we fail to see the detail benefits of shooting at 50MP - to our eyes, those are just upscaled 12.5MP images with a pinch of extra sharpening.
Daylight samples, ultrawide camera (0.6x), 50MP
One of the ultrawide camera's key features is its ability to focus down to some pretty short subject distances. There's an auto-macro switching logic to combat if you don't want the phone to be making decisions for you - or, you know, just turn off the toggle from the camera's quick settings, took us long enough to find it. The way it works is when you're on the main camera, it will switch to a digitally zoomed-in view from the ultrawide, giving you tighter framing but also suboptimal sharpness.
The 'regular' close-ups, at just far enough from the subject that the ultrawide can focus at its native focal length, are predictably great - we already established that the images out of the ultrawide are plenty sharp. You get a ton of detail, and the only 'issue' is that at such short focusing distances, your depth of field is really thin, so maybe you won't get everything you want in focus.
Ultrawide camera, closeups
Macro mode crops in from the ultrawide, making your subjects bigger in the frame, or letting you stand a little further back - not a lot though, because Macro mode will disengage. The phone's logic of operation is such that for Macro mode to kick in when you get really close to a subject. You then need to pull further back for it to go into 'normal' mode, so there's some room for framing. We found no way to force this 'Macro' mode on - we can turn off its auto engagement, so it never gets in the way, but there's no apparent mechanism to stay in macro.
Anyway, these images are still pretty good, if lacking the absolute per-pixel clarity of the above ones. And if they're meant for sharing, the more striking close perspective will be of more value than pixel-level detail.
Ultrawide camera, closeups, Macro mode
The telephoto takes 12MP shots from its 13MP sensor, a decision we don't necessarily understand, but we've come to accept - that's how it was on the Find X3 Pro as well. These photos are sharp and detailed but do have a fair bit of noise in them. And if that qualifies as criticism (which it isn't necessarily), it's the only one we have - the colors are great, dynamic range is wide, exposure is on point.
Daylight samples, telephoto camera (2x zoom)
Hardly a fault of this camera per se, but more of the system as a whole, at just 2x of optical zoom power, the Find X5 Pro offers limited reach. Even traditionally conservative lineups like the iPhone and Pixel are at 3x and 4x, and the Galaxy Ultra's 3x-10x dual tele is now in its second generation. And it's even more frustrating because it was precisely Oppo that was once on the forefront of long zooms.
Low-light image quality
In low light, the phone takes essentially the same photos in Photo mode and in Night mode, and that's no bad thing. The main camera images are easily among the best ones we've seen. The always-on Night mode processing ensures excellent dynamic range with well-contained highlights and good development in the shadows. There's a ton of detail too. If we have to point out one area that could be improved upon, it's the orange rendition of certain types of warm street lights.
Low-light samples, main camera (1x)
Here's how these scenes look when captured in Night mode.
Low-light samples, main camera (1x), Night mode
It's mostly the same story with the ultrawide camera. We're looking at photos that are about as good as you can get - wide dynamic range, great rendition of the tonal extremes, excellent detail. If anything, these are a notch better than the above in that they're missing the orange cast that the main camera can have.
Low-light samples, ultrawide camera (0.6x)
For completeness sake, here are the same scenes captured in Night mode.
Low-light samples, ultrawide camera (0.6x)
Our high praise will have to end there, however, since we won't be extending it to the telephoto camera. The relatively small sensor isn't doing a great job at night, so much so that Oppo is barely using it - only the third image in the below sequence is captured on that one, while the rest are sourced from the main camera. That one image is actually pretty solid, though it apparently had a relatively well-lit scene for it to work in the first place.
The rest of the photos have a characteristic upscaled look when examined at 1:1 - we mean the general softness and heavy sharpening. Coming from the main camera, however, they do have great exposure and dynamic range, so if you won't be printing them or pixel-peeping, they'll look good enough.
Low-light samples, main camera (2x)
And another batch of the same, only taken in Night mode.
Low-light samples, main camera (2x), Night mode
We say there's no difference between Photo and Night mode shots, but there's one additional nuance there that must be noted. The Find X5 Pro's Night mode has an extra 'Tripod mode' toggle, for when you have the option for steady support. The process takes 10s flat to shoot and you can see on the screen the various different exposures as the phone captures them before merging them into a final image.
These can offer a small, but appreciable improvement over the already great regular photos, when you have the means to support the phone and you're dealing with mostly stationary subjects. We're seeing slightly crisper detail - in the highlights too, but particularly in the shadows, as well as further improved noise performance.
Low-light samples, main camera, Night mode: Regular • Tripod
Low-light samples, ultrawide camera, Night mode: Regular • Tripod
Low-light samples, ultrawide camera, Night mode: Regular • Tripod
Portrait mode
Portraits on the Find X5 Pro can be captured with the main camera or the telephoto, giving you the usual trade-offs - higher quality but iffy wide-angle perspective from the main camera or superior perspective and shooting distance, but not quite as great image quality from the telephoto cam.
Having said that, the tele does admirably in broad daylight and quality only drops a little in indoor situations (admittedly, pretty well lit still). Subject detection is superb, and the default blur level is just right, making for very convincing results.
Portrait mode samples, telephoto camera
The default blur level is a bit excessive when shooting with the main camera, mostly because we're conditioned that it's not the 'portrait look' to photograph people with wide fast lenses from close range, but you can always tune it down. Subject detection is similarly competent to the tele camera's results.
Portrait mode samples, main camera
Selfies
The selfie camera shoots in the nominal 32MP resolution, and there's no way around it (other than the different aspect ratios that will give you crops from that, but still high-res ones). That's bad in a couple of ways - you don't want to deal with needlessly large files, and there isn't 32MP worth of detail in those shots.
That said, the selfies themselves aren't half bad. They may appear soft-ish on a pixel level, but examining 32MP selfies at 1:1 is missing the point. They have good detail, certainly good enough to look competitively sharp if downscaled to a more sensible 10-12MP. There are also nice colors and wide dynamic range. But perhaps the most important bit about this camera is its wider-than-most 21mm-equivalent focal length which lets you fit more people or context in the frame. There's also a zoomed-in mode, if you prefer your selfies more personal.
Selfie samples
The Portrait mode does what it promises and makes good faux-bokeh shots. It's prone to small missteps here or there, but we didn't observe outright blunders. The one more substantial flaw is the dialing back of HDR, which may leave you with substandard backlit scenes.
Selfie samples, Portrait mode
Once you're done with the real-world samples, head over to our Photo compare tool to see how the Oppo Find X5 Pro stacks up against the competition in our studio.
Oppo Find X5 Pro against the Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Xiaomi 12 Pro in our Photo compare tool
Video quality
The Find X5 Pro records video up to 4K60 with its main and ultrawide cameras. The telephoto is capped at 4K30, though it can also record in 4K60 at 2x zoom, only that mode is sourced from the main camera, so it's lower quality. There's no 8K recording on the Find X5 Pro.
Stabilization is available in all modes and is always on. There's an option to choose whether to encode videos using the h.264 or the h.265 codec, too.
4K videos out of the Find X5 Pro's main camera are superb. They're contrasty but with good development at both the highlight and shadow ends. Colors are pleasingly vivid too, and we observed no weird color casts. We're also seeing excellent detail, and its rendered with a reasonable level of sharpening - not 'natural', strictly speaking, but not excessive either. The above applies to both the 30fps (53Mbps) and 60fps (62Mbps) footage - they're identical in quality.
The ultrawide is similarly indiscriminatory towards frame rates, and its 4K30 and 4K60 clips look the same. And they look great too. These are some of the most detailed 4K videos we've seen from an ultrawide camera, and noise is also kept very low. Colors are nicely saturated but a smidge cooler than on the main camera - we observed this occasional color discrepancy in stills too - hardly an issue in isolation but can be seen in a direct comparison. Dynamic range is excellent on this one, too.
4K30 clips also have respectable detail and are noise-free while maintaining a pleasing color palette. One thing that stood out is the relatively limited highlight dynamic range - look at the glowing white building on the left of the frame and compare it to the rendition in one of the above clips. No big deal, but suboptimal performance.
Stabilization is very effective on the Find X5 Pro. Both the main and the ultrawide stabilize well against walking shake, though the result is perhaps a touch more floaty than ideal. Pans are smooth and have no abrupt transitions, while simply pointing the phone in a fixed direction makes for rock-solid footage. The telephoto camera produces quite stable clips as well.
At the time of reviewing, there was still no Ultra Night Video on the Find X5 Pro, despite the phone having received several updates along the way. On the Find X3 Pro, if you had the AI toggle enabled and the scene drops below a certain light level, Ultra Night Video would engage. On the Find X5 Pro, in the state we reviewed it in, there was no such behavior.
With that Ultra Night mode missing, we're still getting respectably sharp and detailed footage from the main camera. Color saturation is good, too - there's no discoloration in the dark. Not quite stills-like, the dynamic range can be a bit limited, particularly in the highlights, though we may have had our expectations set too high.
The AI Highlight Video toggle does work, and it help reduce haloing around light sources, while, for the most part, maintaining the exposure so your shadows don't suffer. It's no surprise then that the Oppo appears very keen to auto-engage that AI toggle every now and again when it sees you're shooting in the dark. Still, we expected Ultra Night Video but only got AI Highlight Video.
The ultrawide does a pretty solid job as well, particularly in scenes with at least some moderate amount of light.
The telephoto isn't quite as adept at handling darkness but does return usable results - again, provided you don't point it into absolute darkness. This one tends to be particularly halo-y with light sources pointing into the camera, so it's perhaps the most definitive advocate for using the AI Highlight video control toggle.
You can examine how the Oppo Find X5 Pro compares to rivals in our studio scene in our Video compare tool. Head over there for the complete picture.
Oppo Find X5 Pro against the Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Xiaomi 12 Pro in our Video compare tool
Competition
Whether it's at the Find X5 Pro's €1300 list price or the €1200-ish number that you could find at some retailers, pinpointing its rivals shouldn't be difficult - it's only the absolute finest. Those would be the latest and best Galaxy and iPhone, Xiaomi's currently available top-dog, and, just maybe, a Pixel?
In a lot of these bouts, the Find X5 Pro will show up outspec'd when it comes to zooming power, and nowhere is the difference as stark as it is against the Galaxy S22 Ultra. Samsung's 2022 flagship has two teles, and even the short 3x one can get you closer to the action than the Find's modest 2x unit, plus the Galaxy can go all the way up to 10x. So if you find yourself often shooting distant subjects, this one goes easily in Samsung's favor. Then again, the Find would be our pick if you prefer your photography on the wide end of the zoom range, so it's not as clear cut.
The Galaxy has the stylus going for it if that's an advantage for you rather than a nuisance. There's also the brighter screen, better battery life, and the autofocusing selfie camera. The S22 Ultra is easily the more complete package, but we'd argue the Find wins for personality.
It's quite the same situation if we compare it to the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Objectively, the iPhone wins for display quality and battery life, and it does have some extra reach with its telephoto cam. However, the Find may very well be the better overall cameraphone, particularly if you're into a more colorful look. The OS divide stands, but if you're okay with ColorOS' take on Android, perhaps you're not dead-set on Android in the first place.
The Xiaomi 12 Pro offers a thoroughly customized Android experience, too, differently so. It, too, doesn't go beyond 2x natively, but its big-sensor tele is superior to the Oppo's at both digital zoom and low-light photography. And it's not like Xiaomi is losing when it comes to the other cameras. The 12 Pro also has some edge in display quality. There's the matter of endurance though, and the Oppo wins comfortably there, but the Xiaomi can counter with some of the fastest charging we've seen. So it's looking like something of a draw on performance, but then the Xiaomi is nominally a good €250 less expensive, and that tips the scales in its favor, as far as we're concerned.
And if you're after savings, why not get a Pixel 6 Pro? Currently at €800, but even for its €900 MSRP Google's flagship is looking like a proper bargain next to the Find. It comes with some concessions, like last year's chipset, shorter battery life, slower charging and a not-as-good ultrawide camera. The Pixel does have a 4x tele, which is 2x the Find's 2x tele, and there are those who swear by the Pixel photo 'look'. Google's software comes with unique perks, too, the fast updates being chief among them.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G • Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max • Xiaomi 12 Pro • Google Pixel 6 Pro
Verdict
The Find X5 Pro builds on an already great predecessor, and even though it doesn't bring massive changes, it's still a thoroughly capable alternative to the 'default' options in the top-tier segment. Having said that, we had one major issue with the X3 Pro that we hoped to see resolved on the X5 Pro, and it's not - a mere 2x zoom camera simply does not cut it anymore. The fact that it's a fairly simple 2x camera with limited low-light capabilities doesn't help its case either.
Perhaps the other two cameras can make up for the tele's shortcomings, though - the pair of 50MPunits are among the most consistently great ones we've seen, and they deliver spectacular results regardless of the task or time of day. We also like the Find X5 Pro's build and the unusually curvy design that makes it stand out in the sea of blocky rectangular slabs that modern smartphones have become.
It's obviously a fully loaded proper flagship - it features the newest, most powerful chipset, it runs the latest OS, it has an IP68 rating. As all of the competitors do. Battery life is about average for the segment, charging speed is no longer class-leading, the display is wonderful in many ways but trails in maximum brightness.
The point is, the Find X5 Pro has no obvious downsides other than the telephoto reach and is strong on the fundamentals, but that's not making it exceptional. Not enough to justify the sticker price solely on the merits. On the other hand, less sensible decisions can be made than paying a premium for those two cameras in a sexy ceramic shell.
Pros
- Superb 120Hz LTPO2 AMOLED display with granular HRR control and great color accuracy.
- The ceramic back is the most premium and durable material you can get on a phone.
- Main and ultrawide cameras are properly excellent at everything - stills and video, daylight and low light.
- Wide-angle selfie cam is great for group selfies.
- Customizable and feature-rich Color OS 12.1, Android 12.
- Neat features such as 360-degree NFC, and crisp haptic vibration motor.
Cons
- At 2x zoom, the tele camera has a reach that's too short, and it's also not very good in low-light scenes.
- The display's maximum brightness is lower than the competition.
- The 80W charger is barely faster than last year's 65W charger and it doesn't support USB-PD for fast charging your other devices.
healthy weight gain food list
ReplyDeletewoow body
Diet for weight gain in 7 days